Hello again - Forums powered by UBB.threads™

Here you go, Paladius. What follows are the detailed quotes of Charlie's predictions that he got wrong, along with some other highlights which highlight his other nonsense (like not being able to keep his story straight).

The bottom line is that there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE to support the following 20 predictions. Hence, they are wrong.This will only address timeline_39's failed predictions made in THIS THREAD. Other predictions he has made, which have also failed, have already been addressed in those other threads.

His "catastrophe prediction" was incorrect, and proven so in another thread. But in this quote pay attention to his claim that the only thing he lied about before was when he was born (2006), and now he is saying he was really born in 2011. Well, of course he has to say that since the Great Catastrophe did NOT happen in 2006 as he first predicted...he has to keep the hoax going somehow!

But now, on to catalog all his failures:

This was not even a prediction of the future, but merely a case of VERY BAD research! What is most amazing is that Charlie claimed that he was a historian! For a historian to COMPLETELY FAIL in getting the date for the start of the internet is pretty bad! The internet did not start in 1992. Ostensibly, one can claim it started with ARPANET back in 1969! But OK, let's accept that the internet we know and use today is really an artifact of the implementation of TCP/IP as a network standard. January 1, 1983 was the date on which TCP/IP protocols became the only approved protocol on ARPANET.

Wrong. There has been absolutely NO "acceleration" since 1997. Temperatures have essentially remained flat, and since 1997 no other measures of climate would indicate any major changes "kicking in."

That one is still pending falsification. But clearly Charlie is running out of time for the Great Catastrophe, even after re-framing the time it will occur to 2011 since it did not happen in 2006!

That one he did get right!

Still nothing here. And not even a gradual slowing of the rotation, which would cause the days to become longer. But I will not count this as a "fail" (yet) because we have not completed 2011 yet.

It is now approaching two years AFTER this prediction, and we have seen nothing of the sort. And, in fact, the oceans are actually now starting on their cooling trend, as can be seen at the following links:

http://www.examiner.com/x-1586-Baltimore-Weather-Examiner~y2009m1d21-Oceans-are-cooling-according-to-NASA

http://www.skepticalscience.com/cooling-oceans.htm

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/07/the-decrease-in-upper-ocean-heat-content-from-march-to-april-was-1c-largest-since-1979/

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/20/spencer-global-average-sea-surface-temperatures-poised-for-a-plunge/

Those last two are from May 2010. Very recent. Keep an eye on wattupwiththat.com, as they will always keep you updated on any of the global warming false predictions!

Again, nope! The error here is in his supposition that the moon is at a constant inclination with respect to the earth! It is not. So if you accept that as true, which it is not, then you might be shocked and believe him if you were to do the measurements suggested over a month's time.

This article describes the moon's variablity. And take note of the statistics of the moon's topocentric orbital parameters as viewed from Mill Valley, CA at apogee and perigee. Very different altitudes and azimuths.

Non-linear with respect to what? Time? If so, nope.

That is a definite loser of a prediction. But, of course, he knew he had to cover his tracks, so he issued this:

But he even got THAT wrong, because Obama did not win by a "landfall", whatever that is!

But he continued to get things wrong...

Nope. Obama is still "hiding that secret" of the "coming pole shift!"

Here we are in May 2010, many months after Inauguration Day. And still NOTHING that Charlie says has been verified.

Note that...BEFORE 2011. Charlie has a little more than 7 months left before this one counts as another failed prediction. But my tallys above do NOT count this one...yet.

While it may SEEM as if this one is a "hit", it is not. Yes, we have had earthquakes (Haiti, Chile), but there has been NO INCREASE IN RATE. Fail.

Nope. We are now in the months leading up to the end of the time Charlie said the Pole Shift would occur (BEFORE 2011). No anomaly seen, and certainly there is nothing but the moon and known stars that are the brightest things in the night sky! FAIL.

Nothing yet from Obama, and certainly nothing "clear" and time is running out...according to Charlie!

He could not even keep promises he had the ability to keep! He has provided NOTHING FURTHER about natural disasters or a timeline leading up to the alleged Pole Shift.

Markets still hanging around 10,000. Today is about 9900. Lower than the last few months, but certainly not 7500. FAIL.

Taken in concert with the last quote from Charlie, DOW 7500 should have happened "a couple months" after JAN 2009. It is now 16 months after JAN 2009, and still the market is around 10,000. FAIL.

Not much at all has changed with regard to the US relations with Iran...this despite Obama going on his "apologize to the world" tour.

Here is a good one. Not a prediction, but it just goes to show how Charlie has not kept track of what he said:

Ahhh, well, could it be the fact that you did, indeed, say that the Pole Shift would occur BEFORE 2011?

Can't keep his own lies straight!

In reply to:

timeline 39 on 02/11/09:Yes, when the Anomaly is at the distance of 23.1 million kms (the point of which the Pole Shift will occur) it will be visible as you suggest. However, it is currently approaching the interception point from the direction of the Sun and therefore (as I sure you're aware) telescopes are useless.

And telescopes are still useless here in May 2010, because there is no Anomaly visible. NOTHING! And certainly something 23 times as massive as the Earth would be noticed by now! SHEESH!

That is basically all the predictions Charlie made in this thread. One other promise he made, that he did not keep, was that he was going to come back and post a detailed description of the final weeks before the Pole Shift:

In reply to:

timeline 39 on 03/29/09:Our next post will give a very descriptive account of the Final Weeks before the Pole Shift and will be uploaded very soon.

He did not do that, of course. And he is running out of time, according to his "before the end of 2011" prediction.

So again, by my tally of the above, these are 20 predictions he made about the lead-up to the Pole Shift which have NOT come to pass. It is impossible to even give him credit for getting anything right, because he gave no specifics. Although his generalities have failed to materialize.

But the bottom line? Charlie's final exposure as a hoax is merely 7 months away. Once we cross over into 2012 and do NOT experience a Pole Shift and all the lead-in nonsense that Charlie promised, this thread will go on the scrap heap of all the other time travelers predicting doom that eventually failed.

RMT

"I'm not angry, I'm just saying..." - Second Chance, Shinedown - 2008

Post Extras: